Nonce Bitcoin mining data hub: track 17 publicly listed Bitcoin mining companies. Compare BTC production, treasury, hashrate, power capacity, fleet efficiency and unit costs from SEC filings and company disclosures.
| # | Company | Source | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bitdeer Technologies(BTDR) | 2,694 | +32.4% | +376.8% | 150 | 80.9 EH/s | $0.044 | $40K | $36K | 1,795 MW | 15.8 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
| 2 | Marathon Digital Holdings(MARA) | 2,422 | +7.8% | +2.7% | 35,577 | 57.4 EH/s | $0.040 | $61K | $39K | 1,900 MW | 17.3 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 3 | CleanSpark(CLSK) | 1,925 | +7.0% | -4.3% | 13,924 | 45 EH/s | — | — | — | 808 MW | 16.07 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
| 4 | Riot Platforms(RIOT) | 1,587 | +7.7% | +11.3% | 11,380 | 37.2 EH/s | $0.036 | $50K | $40K | 1,292 MW | — | 2026Q22 |
| 5 | HIVE Digital Technologies(HIVE) | 1,004 | +14.6% | +147.3% | 190 | 24 EH/s | $0.054 | $51K | $46K | 440 MW | 16.1 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 6 | American Bitcoin(ABTC) | 935 | +14.4% | — | 17,316 | 28.1 EH/s | — | — | — | 710 MW | 16 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 7 | Cango Inc.(CANG) | 656 | — | -53.3% | 1,056 | 27.58 EH/s | — | $73K | — | 50 MW | — | 2026Q22 |
| 8 | Keel Infrastructure(KEEL) | 354 | -8.8% | — | 2,261 | 8.6 EH/s | $0.054 | $93K | $54K | 341 MW | 19 J/TH | 2026Q22 |
| 9 | Cipher Mining(CIFR) | 346 | -23.3% | -32.0% | 646 | 11.6 EH/s | $0.028 | $43K | $37K | 207 MW | 17.2 J/TH | 2026Q22 |
| 10 | Core Scientific(CORZ) | 300 | -24.1% | -52.7% | 848 | — | — | $79K | $60K | 300 MW | — | 2026Q23 |
| 11 | Canaan(CAN) | 244 | -5.4% | -14.1% | 1,915 | 5.57 EH/s | $0.043 | — | — | 246.2 MW | 23.7 J/TH | 2026Q22 |
| 12 | BitFuFu(FUFU) | 192 | +52.4% | +34.3% | 1,671 | 15.3 EH/s | — | $59K | — | 273 MW | 17.9 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
| 13 | TeraWulf(WULF) | 179 | +6.5% | -63.1% | 2 | 5.6 EH/s | $0.049 | $45K | $44K | 145 MW | 16.4 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 14 | Soluna Holdings(SLNH) | 23.5 | -17.3% | -17.8% | 0 | 0.598 EH/s | — | $41K | — | 192 MW | 23 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| BTDR | 2,694 |
| MARA | 2,422 |
| CLSK | 1,925 |
| RIOT | 1,587 |
| HIVE | 1,004 |
| ABTC | 935 |
| CANG | 656 |
| KEEL | 354 |
| Label | Value (EH/s) |
|---|---|
| BTDR | 80.9 EH/s |
| MARA | 57.4 EH/s |
| CLSK | 45 EH/s |
| RIOT | 37.2 EH/s |
| ABTC | 28.1 EH/s |
| CANG | 27.58 EH/s |
| HIVE | 24 EH/s |
| FUFU | 15.3 EH/s |
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| MARA | 35,577 |
| ABTC | 17,316 |
| CLSK | 13,924 |
| RIOT | 11,380 |
| KEEL | 2,261 |
| CAN | 1,915 |
| FUFU | 1,671 |
| CANG | 1,056 |
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| BTDR | $39,866 |
| SLNH | $40,766 |
| CIFR | $43,486 |
| WULF | $44,547 |
| RIOT | $49,912 |
| HIVE | $50,797 |
| FUFU | $59,000 |
| MARA | $60,743 |
A negative value does not mean mining is free — it means the company reports on a net basis: subsidies, demand response revenue, curtailment compensation, or power resale revenue can exceed actual electricity cost in a period, making the net electricity price or energy cost per bitcoin go below zero.
Energy cost per bitcoin covers electricity / energy only. Cash cost per bitcoin is broader: site operations, hosting fees, maintenance, mining pool fees, on-site labor, insurance, and other direct cash outflows. Cash cost is typically higher.
Average operating hashrate is the hashrate that actually runs and produces BTC over a period. It differs from deployed / installed hashrate — those do not guarantee full-quarter uptime. Since BTC production and electricity consumption come from actual operations, average operating hashrate aligns best for cross-company comparison.
Data snapshot built 2026-09-20
Disclosure has multiple methodologies; common differences:
Different numbers usually mean different methodology, not an error.
Business structure and disclosure practices evolve:
We track both the number and its source / methodology.